GENIUS Act: Fool's Gold

QUESTION 

In the last few weeks, you have been dealing with the controversial subject of cryptocurrency and the GENIUS Act regarding its impact on mortgage banking. I have been worrying about something since the legitimization of cryptocurrency started. 

I am probably the least likely to bring up my concerns about it since I am the CEO of a large lender that would definitely make thousands of mortgage loans if crypto can be used in the loan transaction. But I do not want to originate unstable mortgages! 

I'm not a fool, and I do not want to originate loans based on the modern equivalent of Fool's Gold. 

I sense there is a rat in this stablecoin initiative. And, like so many other things in our government, I think that rat may be people who are going to get superrich, and especially the president of the United States. By the way, I am not a Democrat. I have voted Republican my whole life. I'm sure both Democrats and Republicans are also going to make significant profits in crypto transactions. 

My spider-sense is telling me this is all more than a stablecoin solution to a problem that, as far as I can tell, doesn't exist. I am concerned about politicians profiting at the risk of mortgage lenders. So, I am hoping you could tell us your view of how President Trump and other politicians will benefit financially in the stablecoin era. 

How can the President and other politicians benefit personally from the GENIUS Act? 

SOLUTION 

CMS Tune-up®

Compliance Management System
Second Line of Defense

RESPONSE 

In the huge response I have gotten to my recent articles on cryptocurrency and the GENIUS Act – respectively, Cryptocurrency: Risks to Mortgage Banking and GENIUS Act: Mortgage Banking Ambush – several commenters frame their concerns as "controversial." My view, though, is that controversy can be a fearful way to avoid truth. We should stay calm, not get angry, and rationally evaluate an issue. 

Thomas Carlyle paraphrased the Buddha when he said

In a controversy, the instant we feel anger, we have already ceased striving for the truth and have begun striving for ourselves. 

Ultimately, the essence of disputes and our reactions to them can be understood better when we emphasize the importance of seeking truth over personal gain. Thus, I am not concerned about controversy because I strive to resolve issues in a clear, unbiased, factual, and rational way. 

Politicians of both parties seem to be quite bewitched by digital assets in general, and stablecoins in particular. Indeed, one hundred Democrats in the House voted for the Genius Act, many in the Democratic Party leadership. And in the Senate, eighteen Democrats voted for it. Virtually all the Republicans voted for the Genius Act in the House and Senate.[i] 

I can't blame you for being skeptical of the crypto legislation. However, as I stated in my previous articles, there are several positive and negative aspects to consider. That said, unfortunately, some persons may stand to benefit financially. Just like on Wall Street, sometimes insiders can exploit financial opportunities. Congress is no exception. There have been several legislative attempts to prohibit congressional members from trading individual stocks and to prevent financial conflicts of interest. The Democrats have introduced each of them, and nearly all Republicans have opposed them. The most recent legislative effort was introduced by Democrats again in May 2025, called the Ban Congressional Stock Trading Act. 

I'm not so sure you should single out President Trump for special attention. Perhaps his potential gain from the stablecoin legislation is an example of how a system can lead to undesirable consequences. 

Stafford Beer, the British theorist, famously said 

The purpose of a system is what it does. 

In other words, a system can have unintended consequences, it can have undesirable consequences, and just relying on its stated goals can be misleading because rhetoric and intentions may be outweighed by actual behavior and outcomes.

GENIUS Act: Mortgage Banking Ambush

QUESTION 

In your recent article, Cryptocurrency: Risks to Mortgage Banking, you said that you received many inquiries about the GENIUS Act. I was one of those who requested your view. You shared that you would respond to our questions soon. I am writing you again to urge you to offer an article on the GENIUS Act. 

I am a former federal regulator. I read the whole Act. It bothers me that the Act does not adequately protect consumers. And, I am concerned that it adds an element of instability to our banking system. Also, I do not think the mortgage market can be stable if it comes to depend on digital assets. 

So, I am asking you not to wait. I think the GENIUS Act is ambushing the banking sector. We need to know your view of the GENIUS Act since you are an expert in mortgage compliance. Please consider the following questions. 

In layperson's terms, what is the GENIUS Act? 

What are some of the general features of the Act? 

How does the GENIUS Act affect mortgage loans? 

SOLUTION 

CMS Tune-up

RESPONSE 

We received a huge response to the article we published on August 7^th. The article, Cryptocurrency: Risks to Mortgage Banking, sought to answer these two posed questions: 

·       Should cryptocurrency be accepted in lieu of dollars for a down payment on mortgage loans? 

·       How has the Trump Administration supported cryptocurrency? 

Apropos of your being a former federal regulator, in my summary, I wrote:

 

The regulatory uncertainty is extremely concerning. The regulatory environment for crypto-backed mortgages is still evolving and lacks uniformity across jurisdictions. A sudden shift in regulations or government policy regarding digital assets could significantly impact how these loans are structured, taxed, or regulated. 

I'm sure you understand the implications. 

I will provide a brief outline of the GENIUS Act (the acronym of Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act), which was signed into law on July 18, 2025. The hype about it is that it represents the first comprehensive federal legislation in the United States addressing the regulation of stablecoins. 

By the way, I wish Congress would stop naming bills and acts in acronyms. It's really kind of silly. Supposedly, it is done for mnemonic reasons, but I see it more as branding, salesmanship, and maybe practical convenience. While acronyms may be helpful, they can also be misleading. Some acronyms are created to sound good, like the GENIUS Act, even if they don't accurately reflect the content of the bill. I wonder if there's a whole department in Congress set up to devise acronyms for legislation. But let's move on! 

KEY ASPECTS OF THE GENIUS ACT 

Purpose 

Ostensibly, the GENIUS Act is being promoted to foster innovation, maintain the dollar's global standing, and combat illicit activity. 

The Act has the preliminary makings of a potential regulatory framework that provides some clarity to encourage innovation and adoption in the stablecoins industry. But details matter, which I'll get to shortly. 

As to maintaining the US dollar's global standing, if you read my article on cryptocurrency's risk to mortgage banking (cited above), you probably already know my view of this aspiration. By requiring stablecoin reserves to be backed with US dollars and Treasuries, the Act seeks to strengthen the dollar's role as the global reserve currency. However, among other things, the government does not back cryptocurrency accounts and holdings in online wallets. They are not insured by the government like US bank deposits. It is prone to scams, thefts, and cyber hacks. And, there are no organizations that protect against crypto losses. I'm not convinced that the Act overcomes these challenges sufficiently to protect the consumer.

Cryptocurrency: Risks to Mortgage Banking

QUESTION 

My bank's management is deciding whether to accept cryptocurrency in down payments on mortgage loans. We have a large third-party originator channel. These TPOs are both banks and nonbanks, and some of them want to accept cryptocurrency rather than dollars. Frankly, I am very concerned about it. I don't think crypto is stable. 

On top of that, the Trump Administration wants to make crypto a legitimate asset, like the dollar. I believe they want to use it as part of our reserve currency. I know how Bitcoin works. A reliable, inherent standard, such as the GDP or other statistical metrics, does not influence it directly. There's no underlying metric other than market demand. 

As my bank's CFO, I do not feel that cryptocurrency should have the same fungibility as the dollar. I am worried that we are diminishing our reserve currency status. I know your newsletter is widely read and you don't shy from controversy, so I am hoping that your feedback will provide more perspective than all the pros and cons we're hearing in the news. 

Should cryptocurrency be accepted in lieu of dollars for a down payment on mortgage loans? 

How has the Trump Administration supported cryptocurrency? 

SOLUTION 

Policies Tune-up® 

RESPONSE 

Thank you for your kind words. I've been told the newsletter is popular. The subscriber base is very large. As to shying away from controversy, sometimes people would rather go to their silos than consider different viewpoints. Fortunately, based on the feedback, almost all our subscribers are genuinely interested in exploring various perspectives on legal and regulatory compliance. There is a political tint to regulations and legislation that is unavoidable. These do not get promulgated in a vacuum. And, if you're expressing concern, you can be sure that many other individuals are expressing similar concerns, whatever the topic. 

So, I do not shy away from controversy. And I ask you also not to be shy of controversy in your questions and comments. I read every one of them and answer most! 

Let's first discuss whether cryptocurrency is safe versus the dollar. Conceptually, I think it's possible to outline a response based on four categories: backing and regulation, volatility and potential for loss, insurance and consumer protections, and security and scams. This composite may be helpful in establishing a comparison, given that the dollar is a worldwide reserve currency that investors in dollar-denominated assets continually evaluate in terms of the foregoing categories. 

The following sets forth a brief comparative outline. We will provide a table of this outline if you request it here. 

Backing and Regulation 

US Dollar (Fiat Currency) 

The US dollar is a centralized fiat currency, meaning it's issued, backed, and maintained by the government and is considered legal tender. It's regulated by central authorities like the Federal Reserve, which works to minimize inflation and maintain economic stability. It is not backed by a physical commodity such as gold or silver. Instead, its value is derived from the trust and confidence that people place in the issuing government and the stability of the economy it represents. 

Characteristics of a fiat currency are that it is government-issued, not backed by a commodity, its value is based on trust and confidence, it is always a controlled supply, and it is legal tender. 

As I see it, any fiat currency has pros and cons. On the pro side, it offers economic stability, especially by governments and central banks controlling the money supply and interest rates, the goal of which would be to reduce economic downturns. It is flexible, too, because governments can expand or contract the money supply to combat inflation and stimulate economic growth. And, as I said above, it can support international trade, because it facilitates international transactions without necessitating trading partners and countries to stockpile physical commodities like gold to back their currencies.