THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE MORTGAGE COMPLIANCE SOLUTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES.

LENDERS COMPLIANCE GROUP belongs to these National Organizations:

ABA | MBA | NAMB | AARMR | MISMO | ARMCP | ALTA | IIA | ACAMS | IAPP | MERSCORP

Friday, June 27, 2014

Actual versus Average Charges

QUESTION
When may a HUD-1 Settlement Statement include charges for services that will be greater than the actual charge?

ANSWER
The amount stated in a HUD-1 Settlement Statement for any itemized service may not exceed the amount actually received by the settlement service provider for that specific itemized service, unless the charge is an average charge determined in accordance with Regulation X, the implementing regulation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA).

Regulation X provides requirements for how a settlement service provider may impose an average charge for certain services. This is called the “average charge” approach. It should be noted that the average charge may not be used for any settlement service where the charge for that service is based on the loan amount or property value.

Thus, the average charge may not be used with charges such as transfer taxes, interest charges, reserves, escrow, or in fact any type of insurance (i.e., mortgage, title and hazard insurance). [24 CFR § 3500.8(b)(2)]

While RESPA permits the use of any average charge under certain conditions, an average charge may not be permitted under other laws or loan program requirements. Therefore, where using the average charge, the lender should take into consideration all applicable laws and loan program requirements. 

Jonathan Foxx
President & Managing Director
Lenders Compliance Group